Wednesday, 8 April 2015

site update


Hi Reader

I am currently trying to get some bits of Fiction I have written ready for publication so please bear with me while I spend the lion’s share of my time on that.  I have taken down the ‘grand tour of the solar system’ because I wasn’t happy with how the articles flowed.  I will be re-writing them in due course.  Until then there’s plenty of stuff to view and if you have any comments, suggestions or just want to tell me I’m plain wrong please e-mail me on: robinbdevlin@outlook.com

Stay awesome

Robin.B.Devlin

Wednesday, 1 April 2015

REVIEW: Starship Troopers


Starship troopers: a Maligned Classic

“Someone asked me once if I knew the difference between a civilian and a citizen. I know now. A citizen has the courage to make the safety of the human race their personal responsibility.”

John Rico
Starship troopers is one of the most maligned films of all time, panned by critics on its release, 17 years ago, they called it a “nonstop splatterfest so devoid of taste and logic that it makes even the most brainless summer block buster look intelligent” in the Deseret News and the New York Post called it a “Crazed, lurid spectacle,” as featuring “raunchiness tailor-made for teen-age boys.” Even Roger Ebert who had lorded the social satire of Robocop said that the movie was a “one dimensional trivial nothing pitched at 11 year old sci-fi fans.”  But is that all it really is?
I feel that the critics have missed the mark somewhat; Starship troopers was, and is, a searing incitement of right wing militaristic culture.  Even though the film is 17 years old now (yes I feel old too RBD) the message is still as clear as a bell and that message can be summed up simply as “War makes fascists of us all.” The movie comes out and says that violence is “the supreme authority from which all others are derived” and that “Naked force has resolved more conflicts throughout history than any other factor. The contrary opinion, that violence doesn't solve anything, is wishful thinking at its worst. People who forget that always die” these are not the words of a military recruitment officer or of a drill sergeant but the words of a teacher in a high school.  The director of the film, Paul Verhoeven, (he of Robocop and Total Recall fame) is on record as saying that the film was playing with fascism and fascist imagery to point out certain aspects of American culture.  And one can’t help but see a comparison between the gung-ho jingoism of the propaganda films and the rightwing media in the states, especially fox news.
Set in the far of future where mankind has reached out to the stars and started to colonize alien planets. This rabid colonialism has provoked an otherwise peaceful race of insect-like aliens to lash out against earth, which it suddenly and quite rightly now sees as hostile. Seeing fairly obvious self-defense tactics as further gestures of aggression Humankind musters its global forces and charges headlong into a grossly outmatched interstellar war, the film uses this as a spring board for a satire on the first Gulf war but it really works for any war that the USA has fought in since the end of the second world war, with the well trained and well equipped troops of Earth representing the states and the poorly equipped and not at all trained bugs representing the Vietnamese or the Iraqis The film is loosely  based on a 1959 novel of the same name by Robert A Heinlein the book was meant to be more of a political Essay than a work of pure fiction with large a large portion set in a school classroom the charicters debate with there History and moral philosophy teacher(played by the awesomely understated Michael Ironside), who many consider to be speaking in Heinlein’s own voice. The script itself was a totally unrelated entity called ‘bug hunt at outpost nine’  Paul Verhoeven admits to not being able to finish the book as he found it ‘depressing and boring’.  The film can also be seen as a work on ‘paradise lost’ with the innocents of youth replaced with the hell of war.
 
Even by todays standard the special effects look good, partly because they used real models, it took over a year for model builders, and special effect artists boss film Sony image works and good old industrial light and magic to make the ships that you see on screen.   The movie offers up a beautiful totalitarian state where all the children are beautiful wide eyed and innocent, whereas the adults by contrast are usually maimed in some way from there service.  The world itself feels fully fleshed out with different types of alien fulfilling different roles put together the world feels rich and detailed, if somewhat unsettling.
The movie concerns the lives of three high school friends, all of whom sign up for military service after leaving high school. Denise Richards plays Carman a high flyer who wants to pilot starships, Casper Van Dean plays Johnny Rico her boyfriend who doesn’t really want to join the military but signs on to impress his girlfriend, and there mutual friend Carl, played by Neil Patrick Harris who joins up because… well they never say but it is strongly implied that career choices are limited.  So the three join up, Carmen goes to fleet to learn how to fly, Johnny goes into the Mobile infantry to learn how to kill and Carl goes into military intelligence to learn how to commit genocide and the film then follows John Rico’s journey from being a fairly amiable high school jock hero to being a cold blooded killing machine.  Our hero loses the love of his life when she decides to make a career out of being a pilot, as opposed to just fulfilling her two year service as Rico intended on doing, then an accident on the training field see him take ten lashes as punishment, his dues paid he decides to wash out and quit before he finishes his term of service and to give the fascist state in the movie its due they allow him to, that is until his hometown, Buenos Aires, is whipped of the face of the planet by a meteorite.  It is then at our heroes lowest ebb that he reaches inside himself and is reborn, now a man.  It is worth mentioning that there is no concrete proof that the meteorite strike was in fact an attack by the ‘bugs’ and could have in reality just been a random regular act of god, but the all-powerful Earth government treated it as a hostile action and used it as justification to go to war.
 

Tuesday, 31 March 2015

NEWS: Life on mars.


The curiosity rover has found a civilised race of microbes living on the surface of mars it was revealed today by NASA scientist.  In an interview with space.com Professor April Jape said: ‘it’s totally bitchin’’ and went on to yell ‘conga’ and proceeded to make a train across the floor.  President Obama has said that he will send a manned mission to mars in order to have Earth scientists something to do.

 

Bazinga.


But seriously over three hundred hits this month! thanks guys and happy April Fools Day!

Sunday, 29 March 2015

FEATURE: Kepler’s laws

Kepler’s laws
 
I measured the skies, now the shadows I measure, sky bound was the mind, earth-bound the body rests
Kepler’s epitaph

Johannes Kepler’s three laws of planetary motion are a cornerstone of modern physics they describe the elliptical paths taken by planets around the sun, the time it takes to complete one orbit and how distant planets more slowly than nearby ones. These laws are applied today in the detection of dark matter and can also be applied to planets orbiting distant stars. Kepler 1571-1630 grew up in Germany with his mother living at his grandfather’s inn.  He became interested in astronomy as a child and by the time he was ten he had recorded a comet and a lunar eclipse in his diary.  Kepler studied at the university of Tubingen and went on to teach mathematics at Graz.  Kepler thought that god had created the universe according to a mathematical plan.  His theory of cosmology was published in ‘the sacred mystery of the cosmos’ he later assisted Tycho Brahe at his observatory outside Prague inheriting his position as imperial mathematician in 1601.  There Kepler prepared horoscopes and analysed Tycho’s astronomical tables publishing his theories of non-circular orbits and the first and second laws of planetary motion in ‘New Astronomy’ the third law of planetary motion was published in ‘harmony of the worlds’

                Modern astronomy began in 1609 with the publication of his masterwork ‘Astronomia nova’ Kepler had derived equations to describe the orbits of the planets based on careful records of the motions of mars taken by Tycho Brahe a Danish astronomer and aristocrat for whom Kepler worked as an instrument builder.  Kepler’s measurements of mars where much more accurate than had been achieved before.

Kepler’s first law


Kepler’s first law states that planets trace out an elliptical path with the sun at one focus of the ellipse. Until this radical theory was put forward everyone believed the orbits of planets to be perfect circles, it was thought that nature loved perfection and abhorred deviation from it Kepler inherited this belief at first imagining that planets were arranged about the sun in a nested series of crystal spheres spaced according to mathematical ratios derived from polygons.  But Tycho’s data caused him to change his mind.  When viewed from earth Mars's speed seems to seems to vary considerably it also seems to take backward steps drawing out loops in the sky.  Before Kepler many had tried to explain away the retrograde movements by adding small extra circles known as epicycles to large circular orbits.  In fact these days the phrase adding epicycles is a byword for bad science.  Kepler spotted that an ellipse did a much better job of explain Mars’s motion and to realize that it is because we are viewing the solar system from a moving platform that the other planets seem to back track.

Kepler’s second law


In his second law Kepler details how quickly a planet moves around its orbit; as it progresses along its elliptical path, it sweeps out a segment of equal area in an equal time. The segment like a slice of pie is measured by drawing a line from the planet to the sun and again at a given period.  When the planet is close to the sun it moves quickly and it draws out a broad pie slice; when it is further from the sun it travels more slowly subtending a smaller angle in the same amount of time. But states Kepler’s second law, the area of this long thin pie slice is the same as that of the short fat one.  Kepler figured this out by noting how fast mars moved around its orbit

Nature uses as little as possible of anything
Johannes Kepler

Kepler’s third law


Kepler’s third law goes one step further and tells us how the orbital periods scale up for different sized ellipses at a range of distances from the sun.  It states that the squares of the orbital periods are proportional to the cube power of the longest axis of the elliptical orbit.  The larger the elliptical orbit, the slower the period of time taken to complete an orbit, So planets further from the sun orbit more slowly than nearby planets.  Mars takes nearly two Earth years to go around the Sun, Saturn 29 years and Neptune 165 years mercury circles the sun in just 80 earth days.  If Jupiter travelled at the same speed it would take 3.5 Earth years to complete an orbit when in fact it takes 12.
 

Modern man


Kepler’s laws have stood the test of time. They apply equally to anybody in orbit around another from comets asteroids and moons in our solar system to planets around other stars and even artificial satellites whizzing around the Earth.  Kepler succeeded in unifying the principles into geometric patterns of nature.  It took Newton to unify these laws into a universal theory of gravity

580 BC
Pythagoras suggests that planets orbit on the surface of perfect spheres
150
Ptolemy explains retrograde motions with epicycles
1543
Copernicus proposes that planets orbit the Sun
1576
Tycho Brahe maps planets positions
1609
Kepler publishes first and second laws
1619
Kepler publishes his third law
1687
Newton proposes theory of gravity
2009
Kepler satellite launched by NASA to find planets around distant stars

PHILOSOPHY: Are we brain's in a vat?


How can you be sure you’re not dreaming, right now?  If the experience of dreaming is indistinguishable from that of wakening, how do you know where the dream ends and reality begins?
We think we know lots of things but how can we defend such claims, what grounds can we produce to justify any particular clame to knowledge?  Our supposed knowledge of the world is biased entirely on our perceptions of the world, garnered via our senses, normally with our sense of reason mediating.

But are not such perceptions open to error?
Is it possible to ever be sure that we are not hallucinating or dreaming or that our memory isn’t playing a trick on us?

These are augments that are as old as philosophy itself, but in there modern guise they can be traced back to the 17th century Descartes who, in his 1641 book: meditations on first philosopher, aimed to reconstruct the entire edifice of human knowledge on unshakable foundations, for which he adopted what he called a ‘method of doubt’  whereby he discarded any beliefs susceptible to the slightest degree of uncertainty.  After pointing out the unreliability of our senses and the confusion created by dreams Descartes pushed his method of doubt to the limit:

“I shall suppose… that some malicious demon of the utmost power and cunning has employed all his energies in order to deceive me.  I shall think that the sky, the air, the earth, colours, shapes sounds and all external things are merely the delusions of dreams which he has devised to ensnare my judgment”

This idea was brought up to date by the modern philosopher Hilary Putnam in his 1981 book asked us to imagine ourselves as a brain in a vat, placed there by some evil scientist, the nerve endings having been connected to a highly advanced computer which cases the brain to believe that everything is perfectly normal.  If this living nightmare sounds like the stuff of science fiction  think on this for a moment, isn’t that exactly what an envated brain would think?  Your brain may well be in a vat rather than a skull, but your every  experience is exactly as it would have been in a real body in the real world. So the world all around you, your body, the screen your reading this on, even me writing this article for you to read are all part of the illusion.
Probably you don’t believe that you’re a brain in a vat, most philosophers don’t believe that they are brains in vats but that’s the rub; you don’t have to believe it you just have to believe that it is possible no matter how unlikely. And if it is possible you don’t really know anything at all, since all your knowledge would have derived from a computer simulation of reality and not from the real world. 

Descartes and Putman, although both playing devil’s advocate many philosophers have been impressed by their skill in setting the sceptical trap than by their subsequent attempts to extricate themselves from it. 

And *THAT* is why The Matrix is one of the best film's of the 1990’s.  But neither science nor philosophy can tell us why the sequels sucked so much

Saturday, 28 March 2015

NEWS: Mission to Jupiters Moon Europa.


Jupiter's icy moon Europa
NASA’s 2016 budget request includes $30 million for a dedicated mission to Jupiter’s icy moon, Europa, considered one of the best prospects for discovering life in our solar system. NASA’s Robert Pappalardo the pre project scientist for the Europa Clipper probe concept said “This is a big deal, we’re moving towards the next phase, where you’re a real mission. It’s just thrilling after 15 years of pushing for it.” NASA has already begun preliminary work on such a mission but it was missing a commitment to further funding. Now, it has requested $225 million over the next five years, and plans to select science instruments in the spring.  The mission is likely to involve multiple flybys from a spacecraft rather than landing on the moons surface."Europa is a very challenging mission operating in a really high radiation environment, and there's lots to do to prepare for it," NASA chief financial officer Beth Robinson told reporters Tuesday. "We're looking for a launch some time in the mid-2020s."

FEATURE: Galileo, The father of Mordern Science


The bible shows the way to go to heaven, not the way the heavens go

Galileo Galilei

 

Galileo Galilei was born into a world where the Sun orbited the Earth and the Earth stood still in space.  This belief was confirmed every day by the path of the sun arching across the heavens.  It was a world view originally set out by the ancient philosopher Aristotle who believed that the Sun was just one of many objects that orbit the static Earth.  The Vatican considered astronomy to be the study of gods domain and there was also a practical reason to study the stars, they cycle of sunrise and sunset defined the cycle of morning and evening prayer, the spring equinox told them when to plant there gardens, the winter solstice foreshadowed Christmas. And the phases of the moon fixed the dates of lent and Easter.

Born on the 15th of February 1564 Galileo was the oldest of six siblings, his father was a musician of some repute. Galileo started his education in a monastery, the Camaldolese monastery in Vallombrosa.  Galileo toyed with the idea of becoming a priest, and despite later in life holding views contrary to the church remained a devout catholic.   In 1583 Galileo started to study medicine at the university of Pisa where he became fascinated with mathematics and physics.  It was while studying at Pisa that Galileo was exposed to the Aristotelian theory, at the time this was the leading view of the world being the only one sanctioned by the Roman Catholic Church.  At this time, like any other intellectual of his time, Galileo supported this theory.  Due to financial difficulties Galileo left the university before earning his degree in 1585.

It was this year that he wrote his first scientific book ‘The little balance’  describing the hydrostatic principles of weighing small quantities, this gained him a teaching position at the university of Pisa.  In 1589 Galileo conducted his famous experiments with falling objects and produced his manuscript ‘On motion’ this was contrary to the Aristotelian views about motion and falling objects.  Galileo had become arrogant about his work and his criticisms of Aristotle’s work left him isolated among his colleagues in 1592 his contract with the University of Pisa was not renewed.  He soon found a new position at Padua university at three times the salary he had earned at Pisa.  This was fortuitous as his father had died in 1591 leaving Galileo as the eldest son financial responsible for the family in particular for the dowries he would have to provide for his two younger sisters. 

Galileo had 3 illegitimate children.  The eldest, Virginia born c1600, was given to the Catholic Church and became a nun taking the name Maria Celeste, a number of her letters to him survive to this day and speak of a warm and loving relationship with her father. Although we no longer have his reply’s Maria’s letters have been made into a book, ‘Galileo’s Daughter’

In 1604 Galileo published ‘the operations of the Geometrical and Military Compass’ revealing his skills with practical technological applications and experiments, he also made a hydrostatic balance for measuring small objects.  These developments brought him some measure of fame and fortune that same year he refined his theories on motion and falling objects and developed the universal law of acceleration (which all objects in the universe obeyed.) Galileo began to openly express his support for the Copernican theory that the Earth and the Planets revolve around the Sun, this directly challenged the doctrine of Aristotle and the established order set by the Catholic Church.

In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual

Galileo Galilei

In July 1609 Galileo heard about ‘Dutch perspective glass’ or the telescope and soon, havening never seen one first hand, not only built his own but improved on the original design by increasing the magnification 30 times.  In august of that year he demonstrated it to some merchants from Venice who saw its value for spotting ships up to two hours before it would be visible to the naked eye and gave Galileo a healthy salary to manufacture several of them.  In the autumn of 1609 Galileo became the first astronomer to turn his telescope skywards, and in a stroke invented modern observational astronomy.  By March 1610 he had published his first work on astronomy, the starry messenger, in which he revealed that the moon was not flat and smooth as people believed it to be but was rugged and pot marked with many carters, mountains and valleys.  He also found that Venus had phases like the moon.  This was a monumental discovery as it proved that Venus orbited the sun.  He also discovered Jupiter had four moons, revolving around there parent planet rather than around the sun as the philosophy of the time would dictate.  Soon Galileo had a body of evidence that supported Copernican theory and contradicted Aristotle and the doctrine of the church

In 1612 Galileo published ‘Discourse on bodies in water’ in this work he refuted Aristoteles ideas of why objects float in water, saying that it was not because of their flat shape but instead the weight of the object in relation to the water it displaced.  Furthermore in 1613 he published his observations of sunspots, which further refuted Aristotle doctrine that the sun was perfect.  Later that year Galileo wrote a letter to a student to explain how Copernican theory did not contradict biblical passages, saying that the scripture had been written from the perspective of earthly men and that science provided a different, more accurate perspective.  The letter was made public and the Inquisition consultants of the church pronounced Copernican theory to be heresy.  In 1616 he was ordered by the Vatican not to “hold, teach or defend in any manner” the Copernican theory about the motion of the earth.  Being a good and devoted Catholic he obeys the order for seven years.

Pope Urban VIII allowed Galileo to pursue his work on astronomy, as he was a personal friend of Galileo, in 1623.  The Pope even encouraged him to publish it, on the proviso that he be objective and not advocate Copernican theory to heavily.  In 1632 Galileo published the ‘Dialogue concerning the two chief world systems’ written as a dialogue between three people one of whom  supports Heliocentric theory (the Copernican view) one of whom argues against it and one who is impartial.  This is where Galileo’s arrogance becomes apparent as although he insisted that dialogues was neutral it clearly was not.  The Aristotelian advocate came across as a simpleton, getting caught in his own arguments

The reaction of the church was swift, Galileo soon found himself summoned to Rome.  The Inquisition proceedings lasted from September 1632 until July 1633.  During most of this time Galileo was treated with respect and was not imprisoned or tortured, although it was threatened.  He finally admitted he had supported Copernican theory and held that his statements were correct. He was convicted of heresy and spent the rest of his life under house arrest.  Ordered not to have any visitors or to have any of his works printed outside of Italy, Galileo ignored both rulings against him and in 1634 a French translation of his study of forces and their effects on matter was published, and a year after that, copies of Dialogue were published in Holland. Whilst under house arrest he wrote Two New Sciences a summary of his life’s work on the science of motion and the strength of materials.  It was printed in Holland in 1638.  He was, by now, blind and was in generally ill health and died on January the 8th 1642 after suffering from a fever and heart palpitations.  In time the church could no longer hold it’s position and the truth that Galileo had proved through science could not be denied. In 1758 it lifted the ban on most works supporting Copernican theory and by 1835 dropped its opposition to heliocentrism altogether. 

Friday, 27 March 2015

FEATURE: A history of the telescope.

The invention of the telescope in the early part of the 17th century literally opened the skies up and kick started modern astronomy.  Man was now able to view the creators and sea like plains on the moon, the majestic rings of Saturn and helped us to discover the outer planets. The telescope played a vital role in establishing heliocentric theory and, eventually, it gave access to the entire visible universe.

Just who invented the telescope is not a straightforward question.  Three Dutchmen are credited with trying to apply for a patent for their own designs of a telescope; Hans Lippershey, Zacharias Jansen and Jacob Metius all applied for a patent in 1608.  Of the three only Lippershey was successful, the government paying him a handsome fee for replicating his design.  Word of this “Dutch perspective glass” reached the ears of Galileo who, famously, was one of the first to turn his telescope skyward using its 30 times magnification to discover four of Jupiter’s moons, Venus’s phases.
The simplest version of a telescope uses two lenses slotted at either end of a tube.  The first lens squeezes rays of light inwards so that the eye perceives them as coming from a larger source.  The second lens acts as an eyepiece making the light rays parallel again before they enter the eye so that they can be focused.  The bending of these rays of light is called refraction.  Light travels more slowly in denser materials, such as glass, compared with air.  This explains the mirage of a puddle  on a hot road.  Rays from the sky bend to skim the roads surface because light changes speed in the layer of hot air lying just above the sun baked asphalt.  Hot air is less dense than cooler air, so the light bends away from the vertical and we see the sky’s reflection on the tarmac, looking like a puddle.  The angle by which a ray bends is related to the relative speeds at which it travels in the two materials.
Refracting telescopes with two lenses have drawbacks, the image appears upside-down this is because the light rays cross over before they reach the eyepiece, For astronomy this isn’t usually an issue; a star looks much the same upside down as it does right way up, this discrepancy can be resolved by including a third lens to invert the image once again but, then the telescope can become long and unwieldy. The second issue is more problematic for astronomers as refracting telescopes produce blurred colour images.  Light of different wavelengths are refracted by different amounts, blue light waves are bent more than red light waves so the colours separate out and the final image loses clarity.  There are new types of lens available today that can minimize this but there size and power are limited.

Reflecting telescopes.  To solve the problems endemic with refracting telescopes, Newton invented the reflecting telescope.  Using a curved mirror rather than a lens to bend the light he essentially halved the length of the telescope, folding it in half and making it easier to handle.  His design also avoided the differential blurring because the mirrored surface reflects all colours of light in the same way.  However, mirror silvering techniques were not advanced in newton’s day so it took centuries for the design to be perfected.
Today, most professional astronomical telescopes use a giant mirror rather than a lens to collect celestial light and bounce it back to the eyepiece.  The size of the mirror dictates how much light can be collected – a big area lets you see very faint objects. The mirrors in modern optical telescopes can be the size of a room, the largest currently in use such as those in the twin giant Keck telescopes on Mauna Kea in Hawaii, are about 10 meters across.  Even bigger ones up to 100 meters in diameter are planned in the coming decades.
Very large mirrors are tricky to construct since they become so heavy that their shape distorts when the telescope tilts to scan the sky.  Clever construction methods are needed to make them as light as possible.  Some are built in many segments; others are carefully spun so they are very thin yet accurately sculpted.  An alternative solution, called ‘adaptive optics’ is to constantly correct the mirrors shape using a network of tiny pistons glued underneath to push up the surface when it sags.
Beyond the telescopes themselves the clarity of astronomical images is degraded by turbulence in our atmosphere, the scintillation. On even the clearest night stars twinkle, those near the horizon twinkle more than those overhead.  They do so because pockets of air moving in front of them.  Astronomers call the blurring of the stars by our atmosphere ‘seeing’. The size of the optical components in the telescope also gives an absolute limit to the concentration of starlight due to another behaviour of light, diffraction – the bending of light rays around the edge of a lens, aperture or mirror.
To get the best images of stars and planets, astronomers carefully select special locations for their telescopes.  On the surface of the earth they build them on high sites where the air is thin, like mountains, and where the airflow is smooth, such as near the coast. The best sites are in the Chilean Andes and Hawaii’s volcanic peaks.  The ultimate site is space where there is no atmosphere.  The deepest images ever taken of the universe have been made by the orbiting Hubble space telescope.
The Hubble Space Telescope.
Telescopes can operate at wavelengths other than the visible light range.  Infrared, or heat, can be detected with instruments that are like night vision goggles mounted on telescopes as long as the equipment is kept cool.  Because of their very short wavelengths, x-rays are best pursued in space using satellites with reflective optics. Even radio waves can be detected with large single dishes  such as the one at Arecibo (as seen in Goldeneye) or arrays of many smaller antennae, such as the Very Large array in New Mexico (as seen in the film contact).  Perhaps the ultimate telescope is the Earth itself – fundamental particles whiz through it every day, and physicists have placed traps to try and catch them as they do

Wednesday, 25 March 2015

NEWS: Best ever image of Orion

There is a TV program here in the UK called ‘star gazinglive’ it’s presented by an astronomer and a comedian and its one of the best things on.  Seriously, if you get a chance you should check it out.  Anyway they have recently ran a feature whereby they got people to take pictures of the constellation Orion on their camera phones, they would then take all of these images and make a single image out of the hundreds of images that they received.  The final image is amazing and you can see the high resolution version here. If you look closely you can see the horsehead nebula, now remember that these where not taken with a telescope. 

hundreds of images, condensed into one beautiful picture

Tuesday, 24 March 2015

NEWS: Curiosity finds nitrates on Mars



The Curiosity rover takes a selfie.
NASA’s Curiosity rover is still finding clues that could point to the red planet once have been sustaining life it was revealed today.  Nitrates, key to sustaining life on Earth, have been discovered in the Martian soil these could be an indication that the planet once harboured life.

Nitrogen is a prime ingredient of life here on earth so the discovery of it in the Martian rocks makes it more plausible that there was once some forms of life on the red planet. As with the discovery of methane in December 2014 it doesn’t mean that there is life, but it shows that there could have been life during the planets heyday. If nitrogen exists it would have been possible to form the component parts of life like amino acids and DNA

The Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) a lab on board the rover found the compounds containing nitrogen in the sediment that it scooped and drilled from the surface.

“Discovery of indigenous Martian nitrogen in Mars surface materials has important implications for habitability and, specifically, for the potential evolution of a nitrogen cycle (the process where nitrogen is changed between its different forms RBD) at some point in Martian history,” the authors of a new paper describing the findings write 

“We’re going to try to understand whether this process is still happening today at all or whether this all happened in the past in a different Mars, in a different climate regime, in a different atmosphere.” Jennifer Stern, a NASA geochemist, told the LA Times "People want to follow the carbon, but in many ways nitrogen is just as important a nutrient for life Life runs on nitrogen as much as it runs on carbon."

The nitrate could have arrived on the planet via lightning from a volcanic plume or by an asteroid impact causeing thermal shock rather than by life itself having created it.

FEATURE: Keplers laws

Kepler’s laws


Nature uses as little as possible of anything
Johannes Kepler
 
I measured the skies, now the shadows I measure, sky bound was the mind, earth-bound the body rests
Kepler’s epitaph

Johannes Kepler’s three laws of planetary motion are a cornerstone of modern physics they describe the elliptical paths taken by planets around the sun, the time it takes to complete one orbit and how distant planets more slowly than nearby ones. These laws are applied today in the detection of dark matter and can also be applied to planets orbiting distant stars. Kepler 1571-1630 grew up in Germany with his mother living at his grandfather’s inn.  He became interested in astronomy as a child and by the time he was ten he had recorded a comet and a lunar eclipse in his diary.  Kepler studied at the university of Tubingen and went on to teach mathematics at Graz.  Kepler thought that god had created the universe according to a mathematical plan.  His theory of cosmology was published in ‘the sacred mystery of the cosmos’ he later assisted Tycho Brahe at his observatory outside Prague inheriting his position as imperial mathematician in 1601.  There Kepler prepared horoscopes and analysed Tycho’s astronomical tables publishing his theories of non-circular orbits and the first and second laws of planetary motion in ‘New Astronomy’ the third law of planetary motion was published in ‘harmony of the worlds’

                Modern astronomy began in 1609 with the publication of his masterwork ‘Astronomia nova’ Kepler had derived equations to describe the orbits of the planets based on careful records of the motions of mars taken by Tycho Brahe a Danish astronomer and aristocrat for whom Kepler worked as an instrument builder.  Kepler’s measurements of mars where much more accurate than had been achieved before.

Kepler’s first law


Kepler’s first law states that planets trace out an elliptical path with the sun at one focus of the ellipse. Until this radical theory was put forward everyone believed the orbits of planets to be perfect circles, it was thought that nature loved perfection and abhorred deviation from it Kepler inherited this belief at first imagining that planets were arranged about the sun in a nested series of crystal spheres spaced according to mathematical ratios derived from polygons.  But Tycho’s data caused him to change his mind.  When viewed from earth Mars's speed seems to seems to vary considerably it also seems to take backward steps drawing out loops in the sky.  Before Kepler many had tried to explain away the retrograde movements by adding small extra circles known as epicycles to large circular orbits.  In fact these days the phrase adding epicycles is a byword for bad science.  Kepler spotted that an ellipse did a much better job of explain Mars’s motion and to realize that it is because we are viewing the solar system from a moving platform that the other planets seem to back track.

Kepler’s second law


In his second law Kepler details how quickly a planet moves around its orbit; as it progresses along its elliptical path, it sweeps out a segment of equal area in an equal time. The segment like a slice of pie is measured by drawing a line from the planet to the sun and again at a given period.  When the planet is close to the sun it moves quickly and it draws out a broad pie slice; when it is further from the sun it travels more slowly subtending a smaller angle in the same amount of time. But states Kepler’s second law, the area of this long thin pie slice is the same as that of the short fat one.  Kepler figured this out by noting how fast mars moved around its orbit

Kepler’s third law


Kepler’s third law goes one step further and tells us how the orbital periods scale up for different sized ellipses at a range of distances from the sun.  It states that the squares of the orbital periods are proportional to the cube power of the longest axis of the elliptical orbit.  The larger the elliptical orbit, the slower the period of time taken to complete an orbit, So planets further from the sun orbit more slowly than nearby planets.  Mars takes nearly two Earth years to go around the Sun, Saturn 29 years and Neptune 165 years mercury circles the sun in just 80 earth days.  If Jupiter travelled at the same speed it would take 3.5 Earth years to complete an orbit when in fact it takes 12.

Modern man


Kepler’s laws have stood the test of time. They apply equally to anybody in orbit around another from comets asteroids and moons in our solar system to planets around other stars and even artificial satellites whizzing around the Earth.  Kepler succeeded in unifying the principles into geometric patterns of nature.  It took Newton to unify these laws into a universal theory of gravity

580 BC
Pythagoras suggests that planets orbit on the surface of perfect spheres
150
Ptolemy explains retrograde motions with epicycles
1543
Copernicus proposes that planets orbit the Sun
1576
Tycho Brahe maps planets positions
1609
Kepler publishes first and second laws
1619
Kepler publishes his third law
1687
Newton proposes theory of gravity
2009
Kepler satellite launched by NASA to find planets around distant stars