Friday, 27 March 2015

FEATURE: A history of the telescope.

The invention of the telescope in the early part of the 17th century literally opened the skies up and kick started modern astronomy.  Man was now able to view the creators and sea like plains on the moon, the majestic rings of Saturn and helped us to discover the outer planets. The telescope played a vital role in establishing heliocentric theory and, eventually, it gave access to the entire visible universe.

Just who invented the telescope is not a straightforward question.  Three Dutchmen are credited with trying to apply for a patent for their own designs of a telescope; Hans Lippershey, Zacharias Jansen and Jacob Metius all applied for a patent in 1608.  Of the three only Lippershey was successful, the government paying him a handsome fee for replicating his design.  Word of this “Dutch perspective glass” reached the ears of Galileo who, famously, was one of the first to turn his telescope skyward using its 30 times magnification to discover four of Jupiter’s moons, Venus’s phases.
The simplest version of a telescope uses two lenses slotted at either end of a tube.  The first lens squeezes rays of light inwards so that the eye perceives them as coming from a larger source.  The second lens acts as an eyepiece making the light rays parallel again before they enter the eye so that they can be focused.  The bending of these rays of light is called refraction.  Light travels more slowly in denser materials, such as glass, compared with air.  This explains the mirage of a puddle  on a hot road.  Rays from the sky bend to skim the roads surface because light changes speed in the layer of hot air lying just above the sun baked asphalt.  Hot air is less dense than cooler air, so the light bends away from the vertical and we see the sky’s reflection on the tarmac, looking like a puddle.  The angle by which a ray bends is related to the relative speeds at which it travels in the two materials.
Refracting telescopes with two lenses have drawbacks, the image appears upside-down this is because the light rays cross over before they reach the eyepiece, For astronomy this isn’t usually an issue; a star looks much the same upside down as it does right way up, this discrepancy can be resolved by including a third lens to invert the image once again but, then the telescope can become long and unwieldy. The second issue is more problematic for astronomers as refracting telescopes produce blurred colour images.  Light of different wavelengths are refracted by different amounts, blue light waves are bent more than red light waves so the colours separate out and the final image loses clarity.  There are new types of lens available today that can minimize this but there size and power are limited.

Reflecting telescopes.  To solve the problems endemic with refracting telescopes, Newton invented the reflecting telescope.  Using a curved mirror rather than a lens to bend the light he essentially halved the length of the telescope, folding it in half and making it easier to handle.  His design also avoided the differential blurring because the mirrored surface reflects all colours of light in the same way.  However, mirror silvering techniques were not advanced in newton’s day so it took centuries for the design to be perfected.
Today, most professional astronomical telescopes use a giant mirror rather than a lens to collect celestial light and bounce it back to the eyepiece.  The size of the mirror dictates how much light can be collected – a big area lets you see very faint objects. The mirrors in modern optical telescopes can be the size of a room, the largest currently in use such as those in the twin giant Keck telescopes on Mauna Kea in Hawaii, are about 10 meters across.  Even bigger ones up to 100 meters in diameter are planned in the coming decades.
Very large mirrors are tricky to construct since they become so heavy that their shape distorts when the telescope tilts to scan the sky.  Clever construction methods are needed to make them as light as possible.  Some are built in many segments; others are carefully spun so they are very thin yet accurately sculpted.  An alternative solution, called ‘adaptive optics’ is to constantly correct the mirrors shape using a network of tiny pistons glued underneath to push up the surface when it sags.
Beyond the telescopes themselves the clarity of astronomical images is degraded by turbulence in our atmosphere, the scintillation. On even the clearest night stars twinkle, those near the horizon twinkle more than those overhead.  They do so because pockets of air moving in front of them.  Astronomers call the blurring of the stars by our atmosphere ‘seeing’. The size of the optical components in the telescope also gives an absolute limit to the concentration of starlight due to another behaviour of light, diffraction – the bending of light rays around the edge of a lens, aperture or mirror.
To get the best images of stars and planets, astronomers carefully select special locations for their telescopes.  On the surface of the earth they build them on high sites where the air is thin, like mountains, and where the airflow is smooth, such as near the coast. The best sites are in the Chilean Andes and Hawaii’s volcanic peaks.  The ultimate site is space where there is no atmosphere.  The deepest images ever taken of the universe have been made by the orbiting Hubble space telescope.
The Hubble Space Telescope.
Telescopes can operate at wavelengths other than the visible light range.  Infrared, or heat, can be detected with instruments that are like night vision goggles mounted on telescopes as long as the equipment is kept cool.  Because of their very short wavelengths, x-rays are best pursued in space using satellites with reflective optics. Even radio waves can be detected with large single dishes  such as the one at Arecibo (as seen in Goldeneye) or arrays of many smaller antennae, such as the Very Large array in New Mexico (as seen in the film contact).  Perhaps the ultimate telescope is the Earth itself – fundamental particles whiz through it every day, and physicists have placed traps to try and catch them as they do

Wednesday, 25 March 2015

NEWS: Best ever image of Orion

There is a TV program here in the UK called ‘star gazinglive’ it’s presented by an astronomer and a comedian and its one of the best things on.  Seriously, if you get a chance you should check it out.  Anyway they have recently ran a feature whereby they got people to take pictures of the constellation Orion on their camera phones, they would then take all of these images and make a single image out of the hundreds of images that they received.  The final image is amazing and you can see the high resolution version here. If you look closely you can see the horsehead nebula, now remember that these where not taken with a telescope. 

hundreds of images, condensed into one beautiful picture

Tuesday, 24 March 2015

NEWS: Curiosity finds nitrates on Mars



The Curiosity rover takes a selfie.
NASA’s Curiosity rover is still finding clues that could point to the red planet once have been sustaining life it was revealed today.  Nitrates, key to sustaining life on Earth, have been discovered in the Martian soil these could be an indication that the planet once harboured life.

Nitrogen is a prime ingredient of life here on earth so the discovery of it in the Martian rocks makes it more plausible that there was once some forms of life on the red planet. As with the discovery of methane in December 2014 it doesn’t mean that there is life, but it shows that there could have been life during the planets heyday. If nitrogen exists it would have been possible to form the component parts of life like amino acids and DNA

The Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) a lab on board the rover found the compounds containing nitrogen in the sediment that it scooped and drilled from the surface.

“Discovery of indigenous Martian nitrogen in Mars surface materials has important implications for habitability and, specifically, for the potential evolution of a nitrogen cycle (the process where nitrogen is changed between its different forms RBD) at some point in Martian history,” the authors of a new paper describing the findings write 

“We’re going to try to understand whether this process is still happening today at all or whether this all happened in the past in a different Mars, in a different climate regime, in a different atmosphere.” Jennifer Stern, a NASA geochemist, told the LA Times "People want to follow the carbon, but in many ways nitrogen is just as important a nutrient for life Life runs on nitrogen as much as it runs on carbon."

The nitrate could have arrived on the planet via lightning from a volcanic plume or by an asteroid impact causeing thermal shock rather than by life itself having created it.

FEATURE: Keplers laws

Kepler’s laws


Nature uses as little as possible of anything
Johannes Kepler
 
I measured the skies, now the shadows I measure, sky bound was the mind, earth-bound the body rests
Kepler’s epitaph

Johannes Kepler’s three laws of planetary motion are a cornerstone of modern physics they describe the elliptical paths taken by planets around the sun, the time it takes to complete one orbit and how distant planets more slowly than nearby ones. These laws are applied today in the detection of dark matter and can also be applied to planets orbiting distant stars. Kepler 1571-1630 grew up in Germany with his mother living at his grandfather’s inn.  He became interested in astronomy as a child and by the time he was ten he had recorded a comet and a lunar eclipse in his diary.  Kepler studied at the university of Tubingen and went on to teach mathematics at Graz.  Kepler thought that god had created the universe according to a mathematical plan.  His theory of cosmology was published in ‘the sacred mystery of the cosmos’ he later assisted Tycho Brahe at his observatory outside Prague inheriting his position as imperial mathematician in 1601.  There Kepler prepared horoscopes and analysed Tycho’s astronomical tables publishing his theories of non-circular orbits and the first and second laws of planetary motion in ‘New Astronomy’ the third law of planetary motion was published in ‘harmony of the worlds’

                Modern astronomy began in 1609 with the publication of his masterwork ‘Astronomia nova’ Kepler had derived equations to describe the orbits of the planets based on careful records of the motions of mars taken by Tycho Brahe a Danish astronomer and aristocrat for whom Kepler worked as an instrument builder.  Kepler’s measurements of mars where much more accurate than had been achieved before.

Kepler’s first law


Kepler’s first law states that planets trace out an elliptical path with the sun at one focus of the ellipse. Until this radical theory was put forward everyone believed the orbits of planets to be perfect circles, it was thought that nature loved perfection and abhorred deviation from it Kepler inherited this belief at first imagining that planets were arranged about the sun in a nested series of crystal spheres spaced according to mathematical ratios derived from polygons.  But Tycho’s data caused him to change his mind.  When viewed from earth Mars's speed seems to seems to vary considerably it also seems to take backward steps drawing out loops in the sky.  Before Kepler many had tried to explain away the retrograde movements by adding small extra circles known as epicycles to large circular orbits.  In fact these days the phrase adding epicycles is a byword for bad science.  Kepler spotted that an ellipse did a much better job of explain Mars’s motion and to realize that it is because we are viewing the solar system from a moving platform that the other planets seem to back track.

Kepler’s second law


In his second law Kepler details how quickly a planet moves around its orbit; as it progresses along its elliptical path, it sweeps out a segment of equal area in an equal time. The segment like a slice of pie is measured by drawing a line from the planet to the sun and again at a given period.  When the planet is close to the sun it moves quickly and it draws out a broad pie slice; when it is further from the sun it travels more slowly subtending a smaller angle in the same amount of time. But states Kepler’s second law, the area of this long thin pie slice is the same as that of the short fat one.  Kepler figured this out by noting how fast mars moved around its orbit

Kepler’s third law


Kepler’s third law goes one step further and tells us how the orbital periods scale up for different sized ellipses at a range of distances from the sun.  It states that the squares of the orbital periods are proportional to the cube power of the longest axis of the elliptical orbit.  The larger the elliptical orbit, the slower the period of time taken to complete an orbit, So planets further from the sun orbit more slowly than nearby planets.  Mars takes nearly two Earth years to go around the Sun, Saturn 29 years and Neptune 165 years mercury circles the sun in just 80 earth days.  If Jupiter travelled at the same speed it would take 3.5 Earth years to complete an orbit when in fact it takes 12.

Modern man


Kepler’s laws have stood the test of time. They apply equally to anybody in orbit around another from comets asteroids and moons in our solar system to planets around other stars and even artificial satellites whizzing around the Earth.  Kepler succeeded in unifying the principles into geometric patterns of nature.  It took Newton to unify these laws into a universal theory of gravity

580 BC
Pythagoras suggests that planets orbit on the surface of perfect spheres
150
Ptolemy explains retrograde motions with epicycles
1543
Copernicus proposes that planets orbit the Sun
1576
Tycho Brahe maps planets positions
1609
Kepler publishes first and second laws
1619
Kepler publishes his third law
1687
Newton proposes theory of gravity
2009
Kepler satellite launched by NASA to find planets around distant stars

 

 

Saturday, 21 March 2015

BIG QUESTION: How big dose a meteor have to be to survive?

Meteor is probably the most misused term in the English language. It is common for even amateur astronomers to get muddled up. (RBD: Let alone Hollywood!)

Meteor:
A Meteor is actually just the flash of light that happens when an object, such as a meteorite enters the atmosphere.  There sometimes called shooting stars.  Man-made objects (RBD: space junk to put it bluntly) burn up on re-entry they don’t have the same look as the real thing.
Meteoroid           
Any small, solid object in space.  They are normal a part broken from a comet or an asteroid that orbit the sun.  Some rare meteorites are rocks, broken apart from mars and the moon by massive impacts.
Meteorite            
Is any solid object from space that has survived burning up in the atmosphere and has landed on earth. Although very expensive to a collector and sort after for scientific research at least 100 tons of meteoritic material falls to earth every day. Of the meteorites that don't get burnt up in atmosphere:

94% are stony
5% are stone and iron
1% are pure Iron

So, just how big dose a meteor have to be to survive?


Short answer; about as large as a Basket Ball  Long answer; Meteoroids have a pretty big size range from molecule sized to about 330 feet.  Anything larger than this is classed as an asteroid.  The vast majority that the earth encounters is just dust shed by passing comets.
Why would such a tiny speck of matter cause such a large and bright light? That’s down to the speed that they are traveling at, meteoroids enter the atmosphere at blistering speeds,  Up to 162000 Miles per hour, this speed is easy to reach and maintain in space since it’s a vacuum,  the atmosphere of the earth however is literally thick with stuff (RBD: way to be scientific there) this creates friction.  A LOT of friction.  A particle entering the Earth’s atmosphere will hit up to around 3000 degrees centigrade vaporising the meteoroid little by little.  The friction, the same force you make when you rub your hands together when you’re cold, is so immense that it causes the atmosphere and meteoroid to ionize, recombine and this makes the tail.  The tail is usually around a meter wide but the tail, due to the breath taking speed, can be miles in length. 
Most of the 100 tons of material that make it to the ground are particles, tiny speaks of ‘space stuff’ (RBD: put a sheet out in your back garden and wait a while, you’ll pick up a few) that are small enough that they slow down very easily, moving as slowly as one 2.5 centimetres per second through the atmosphere

REVIEW: Big Hero 6


"Our origin story begins. We're gonna be SUPERHEROES!"

Fred

 

From the same team as wreck-it-ralph and frozen comes Big hero 6 the 54th Disney animated film, inspired by the super hero comic book series of the same name.  The focus of the film is the friendship that develops between Bymax, possibly the most huggable robot since Walle, and the films protagonist Hiro. (A hero named Hiro…very good Disney RBD) Hiro is a brilliant but lazy robotics prodigy who is content to waist his skills in the underground bot fighting scene.  It falls to his big brother Tadashi and their like-minded friends: adrenaline junkie Go Go Tamago, neatnik Wasabi, chemistry whiz Honey Lemon and fan boy Fred, to inspire him. Although it is based on a Marvel comic of the same name, there are lots of changes to the names, the setting, and the ethnicities of characters, the back stories, and several plot points.

 Tadashi dies but his robot, Baymax, survives and the film centres on the friendship between the huggable robot and the young genius Hiro.  When Hiro discovers that someone is using his Microbot’s for evil he transforms his friends into a group of superheroes.

The inflatable, vinyl, truly huggable design of Baymax is inspired by 'soft robotics' research at Carnegie Mellon University. The world created in the movie is visually stunning the city of San Fransokyo feels like the kind of place that a robot wearing carbon fibre underpants will fit right in. There is so much detail in there; over 200 different signs were created for the advertisements in the fictional city. The "world" that the animators created is bigger than those of Tangled (2010), Wreck-It Ralph (2012), and Frozen (2013) combined. According to Scott Watanabe, the movie is set in an alternate future where after the 1906 earthquake; San Francisco was rebuilt by Japanese immigrants using techniques that allow movement and flexibility in a seismic event. After the city was finished being rebuilt, it was renamed San Fransokyo due to it being a city with Japanese and American architecture combined.
 
 

Even the films villain is good, he doesn’t sing, he doesn’t get caught monloging he simply gets the job done

This film literally has everything that will make your inner nine year old happy, it has: robots, super heroes, the best car chase seen I have seen in any animation, humour and an ending that could make grown men cry. Better than frozen and smarter than wreck it ralph Big hero 6 is the best Disney film for years.

 

FEATURE: The Drake equation, How many civlised planets are there in the Galaxy

Forty years as an astronomer have not quelled my enthusiasm for lying outside after dark, staring up at the stars. It isn't only the beauty of the night sky that thrills me. It's the sense I have that some of those points of light are the home stars of beings not so different from us, daily cares and all. Who look across space with wonder, just as we do?
Frank Drake

The Drake equation is a famous equation for trying to estimate how many Technological civilisations there might be in the universe, when you look at the size of our galaxy with its billions upon billions of stars around witch many exoplantes orbit the fact is that we simply cannot be alone as the only sentient beings in the cosmos.  However as The Fermi Paradox asks why, given the seemingly endless amount of stars in the night sky, we have not heard from another intelligent race yet.  The simple answer is we don’t know.  Now don’t get me wrong on this I don’t believe that mankind is visited by little green man or even that what happened at Roswell was anything other than a botched military exercise but, I like many better men before me including the grate Carl Sagan himself believe that we are not alone.  The only question is how many other species are out there, and, this is where the drake equation comes in.
The man himself, Frank Drake.
First put forward by Frank Drake in 1961 the equation identifies the specific factors thought to play some role in the development of such civilizations.  There is no unique answer to the equation but it is a generally accepted tool amongst the scientific community to examine these factors.
The equation runs like this:


Where N = the number of civilizations in our galaxy with which communication might be possible.
R* = the average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy.
fp = the fraction of those stars that have planets.
ne = the average number of planets that can potentially support life per star that has planets.
fℓ = the fraction of the above that actually go on to develop life at some point.
fi = the fraction of the above that actually go on to develop intelligent life.
fc = the fraction of civilizations that develop a technology that releases detectable signs of their existence into space.
L = the length of time such civilizations release detectable signals into space.
to give an answer to this equation I'm going to hand over to a much better man than myself.  the late grate Carl Sagan: